Thursday, March 21, 2013
Thursday, March 7, 2013
No Code, Part 7
The technology I am
most recently excited about is an illustrator tablet. While I do fine
art using traditional techniques of drawing and paint, the immediate
results of digital drawing accommodates the immediacy that surrounds
me.
While I tend to have projects strewn about me at all times, it is
a relief to use creative technology within limited space and time
constraints. However, I do not see digital art completely peeling the
paint off of a gallery wall any time soon. Nor projecting a 3D image
in place of a sculpture. There are still so many institutes of
emotive thought that cannot be recreated by some technologies.
Although, the use of digital technologies in conceptual art,
community art, performance art, and interactive art, is something
that is truly unique and fantastic. Art as always cannot be tamed.
There is no code.
No Code, Part 6
When considering my
role as a student and a user, I have sought to learn and use these
digital technologies as a creative prosthesis. I am fascinated with
the creative process and often take an unorthodox approach. Sometimes
I like to just play. Dig in the sandbox. This technique as an artist
can be compared to post modernist movements such as abstract
expressionism and Dada. Perhaps it is the concept behind the creation
that is important, and not the aesthetic value itself. Or perhaps
the emotive design, and lack of concept speak louder than an
intentional narrative. I have also invested time to learn more
traditional graphic design techniques. To use digital programs within
the Adobe suite to execute industry standard works in graphic design
and marketing. By doing this, the ascension of digital technologies
is apparent in the clean and superior execution of graphic works.
But
it is still nice to get dirty..
No Code, Part 6
These themes have
been explored by several authors, and have an almost eerie prophecy
about them. Some authors in particular, that have not only coined
terms in current digital vernacular, have predicted this exact
circumstance; the convergence of humankind and machine. Some of the
most prevalent in popular culture might be the Terminator franchise,
I Robot, or anything authored by Phillip K. Dick. Essentially there
is one common theme, that humankind and machine will converge,
ultimately resulting in conflict. What is discerning about this
pseudo reality is the role large consumer based corporations might
assume to ensure humankind as a product or commodity. However, as
David Foster Wallace scribes, media in general already lends itself
to this phenomenon, and most are already aware.
No Code, Part 5
According to Ray
Kurzweil, the future holds an even more interactive technological
leap. Kurzweil suggests that it can be assumed that computer
technology grows at an exponential rate, and that in the next 40
years, computer intelligence will surpass that of humankind. This not
only implies A.I. Technology, but nanobot technology small enough to
recognize and infiltrate the physiology of humankind. Computers small
enough to act out commands inside of a blood cell.
No Code, Part 4
As technology lends
itself to the marriage of humankind and the immediate environment,
where is the appropriate context to base such speculations? Perhaps
50 years ago, human interaction was more organic, personal,
face-to-face. But there was also terrible discrimination and social
injustice, such as civil rights, and inequality 50 years ago. If it
is choosing the lesser of two evils, I choose the latter. Perhaps an
argument might be posed that humankind was better off before the
industrial revolution, when things were simple. I disagree. With the
instinct to thrive and sustain with a higher standard of living, we
can pretty much agree that 80 percent of the population in the
United States was fairly miserable a 100 years ago. With disease,
volatile warfare, lack of medicine, and conflicting ideologies, we
can see that technology has united and informed
humankind on some sort of global platform.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)